[MLB-WIRELESS] Strange routingissues on (GHO-North-5.8/HVC??)

Peter Buncle peter at nmc.net.au
Mon Mar 12 03:35:28 EST 2012

HI Guy's


I've change the way the routing works on this interface.


Is it better now ?



Kind Regards





From: melbwireless-bounces at lists.wireless.org.au
[mailto:melbwireless-bounces at lists.wireless.org.au] On Behalf Of Robert
Sent: Tuesday, 6 March 2012 8:52 AM
To: David Nuttall; melbwireless at lists.wireless.org.au
Subject: Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] Strange routingissues on


Hi David,

Great!! I'm not going mad!

Looks like I need to talk to Peter (JIA) ... think we need to tempoarily
shut down this interface on HVC until they plug the cord back in on JIA!



On 6/03/2012 12:34 AM, David Nuttall wrote: 

Hi Robert,

Things are going OK till you get to JLP at Heidelberg.  ( is
the incoming interface from Box Hill)

After that is where it goes bad.

If it goes direct to GHO ( all is good.
If it goes via HVC ( it gets lost.

1)  Looking at OSPF at JLP right now, it wants to send traffic to via HVC with a cost of 20!  There is a cost of 10 from
JLP to HVC.  That suggests is directly connected to HVC
with a cost of 10 on it's interface.

2)  I pinged all of the addresses in from JLP and a
response came back from on the HVC interface.  Time was 1

3)  So it looks like you are right, is on both HVC and

4)  A couple of guesses....  Maybe an attempt to directly link HVC with
GHO after JIA died?  Maybe JIA was bridging HVC and GHO?  Someone will




Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wireless.org.au/pipermail/melbwireless/attachments/20120312/cd85abaf/attachment.html>

More information about the Melbwireless mailing list