[MLB-WIRELESS] Strange routing issues on 10.10.129.64/28 (GHO-North-5.8/HVC??)
rhaines at internode.on.net
Tue Mar 6 08:52:19 EST 2012
Great!! I'm not going mad!
Looks like I need to talk to Peter (JIA) ... think we need to tempoarily
shut down this interface on HVC until they plug the cord back in on JIA!
On 6/03/2012 12:34 AM, David Nuttall wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> Things are going OK till you get to JLP at Heidelberg. (10.10.81.33
> is the incoming interface from Box Hill)
> After that is where it goes bad.
> If it goes direct to GHO (10.10.80.5) all is good.
> If it goes via HVC (10.10.2.225) it gets lost.
> 1) Looking at OSPF at JLP right now, it wants to send traffic to
> 10.10.129.64/28 via HVC with a cost of 20! There is a cost of 10 from
> JLP to HVC. That suggests 10.10.129.64/28 is directly connected to
> HVC with a cost of 10 on it's interface.
> 2) I pinged all of the addresses in 10.10.129.64/28 from JLP and a
> response came back from 10.10.129.70 on the HVC interface. Time was 1 mS.
> 3) So it looks like you are right, 10.10.129.64/28 is on both HVC and
> 4) A couple of guesses.... Maybe an attempt to directly link HVC
> with GHO after JIA died? Maybe JIA was bridging HVC and GHO? Someone
> will know!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Melbwireless