[MLB-WIRELESS] meshing
Clae
clae13 at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 21 13:16:57 EST 2002
So perhaps we are eventually looking at a two-tier network, one tier
for simple clients (leaf nodes?) and one for a robust, redundant
mesh-like backbone network, as outlined in the SeattleWireless
article. This would provide for two levels of individual interest
and involvement too - and investment.
The only immediately obvious advantage that an amateur like me can
see with a universal mesh network is that every time an antenna goes
up, the network is extended. And IIRC redundancy builds bandwidth?
I imagine that the packet-clog that an individual might experience
could be weighed against the advantage of being able to help their
mates further up the valley to join in. I can just imagine the
frustration of someone who has spent a largish amount of money under
the impression he/she will be able to do this, only to find that they
can't.
Clae.
<<< heavily snipped original >>>
From: Andrew Harcourt <gfg687472609 at geckomail.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:22:50 +1100
> ...thoughts that at some stage we are going to have a mesh
> network. By that I mean that nodes will be able to pass
> packets along from one to the other...
..If person B is smack bang between persons A and C, they're going to do a lot
of packet forwarding. If person M is between persons A-L on one side and N-Z
on the other, they are going to be doing an *extreme* amount of packet
forwarding...
I think that this kind of approach will quickly swamp the geographically
centralised nodes and cause their maintainers to lose interest...
Contrast this with a backbone-style setup....The routing issues will
have to be sorted out a little more thoroughly, but it will give us
more overall bandwidth to play with ...
IMHO we're going to end up with two main types of nodes: 1) leaf nodes and
2) everything else.
Leaf nodes ...wouldn't need any kind of routing hardware or software
- just run them as an Ethernet bridge ... This is the simplest way we
can get
other people involved - they only have to buy a single piece of hardware, it
comes in a box and they can just plug it in and connect.
Other nodes are going to have to handle a few more routing issues and the
odds are that we'll have to run a decent OS such as Linux or *BSD ...
Regards,
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at melbwireless.dyndns.org with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'
Archive at: http://melbwireless.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless
More information about the Melbwireless
mailing list