[MLB-WIRELESS] IP address range for Geelong?

[Andrew Tiltman]

I dont think he ment running NAT over the RAN, but on our own personal lans
with one main box (doing NAT) connected to the RAN
Just like many of us already do with our dialup and cable connections ;)
-Andrew

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Close" <adrian at close.wattle.id.au>
To: <melbwireless at wireless.org.au>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] IP address range for Geelong?


> On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Jason Hecker wrote:
>
> > >* Many people will want more than one machine at their location.
> >
> > Then they should use NAT for their internal network.
>
> You're joking, right?!  If we're in RFC 1918 land there are plenty of
> addresses to go around without needing to throw the NAT hack into the mix.
> There's enough pain for all of us without NAT.  :)
>
> Think "end-to-end" connectivity.  Do you want to have to use special
> NAT-traversing proxies (that might not exist or even be possible) for
> those weird and wonderful protocols you want to experiment with?
>
> Adrian.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of
'unsubscribe melbwireless'
> Archive at:
http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
> IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless