[MLB-WIRELESS] IP address range for Geelong?

[Adrian Close]

On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Jason Hecker wrote:

> >* Many people will want more than one machine at their location.
>
> Then they should use NAT for their internal network.

You're joking, right?!  If we're in RFC 1918 land there are plenty of
addresses to go around without needing to throw the NAT hack into the mix.
There's enough pain for all of us without NAT.  :)

Think "end-to-end" connectivity.  Do you want to have to use special
NAT-traversing proxies (that might not exist or even be possible) for
those weird and wonderful protocols you want to experiment with?

Adrian.


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless