[MLB-WIRELESS] more important issues

[Joseph Sirucka]

Hi

Tony Langdon wrote:

> > Back to my issue as for ip allocation allow each cell to develop its
> > own, and rework it, etc as it expands/merges (other cells), or have a
> > adressing scheme in place. Currently I'm using the 10.0.0.x addressing
> > range.
>
> Given that most home networks use 10.0.0.x or 192.168.0.x, I strongly
> suggest that we use a more obscure range of IP addresses for our networks.
> Some ideas include:
>
> 10.255.x.x
> 172.31.x.x
> 192.168.255.x
>
> These are all still part of the private address space.
>

I believe in the 10.x.x.x since it would give more room to manevour when the network greatly expands and
interconnectively starts to happen between cells.

>
> By using the more "unusual" addresses, we can minimise the risk of IP
> conflicts.  Personally, for me, a lot of the 192.168.x.x address space will
> cause conflicts for me.
> >
> > Also what would the domain be? x.melbournewireless.dyns.org?, or each
> > cell to his own.
>
> Well, we will probably need a split DNS...  internal and external having
> having different data.  Also, I think we should register a domain.  Dyndns
> will be too inflexible, and is designed to resolve publicly accessible IPs
> which are dynamic - a different kettle of fish.
>

Yes the above on split dns and a registered domains would be nice.

Joseph

>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at melbwireless.dyndns.org with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'
> Archive of the Entire mailinst list at:
> http://melbwireless.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at melbwireless.dyndns.org with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive of the Entire mailinst list at:
http://melbwireless.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless