[MLB-WIRELESS] more important issues

[Tony Langdon]

> Back to my issue as for ip allocation allow each cell to develop its
> own, and rework it, etc as it expands/merges (other cells), or have a
> adressing scheme in place. Currently I'm using the 10.0.0.x addressing
> range.

Given that most home networks use 10.0.0.x or 192.168.0.x, I strongly
suggest that we use a more obscure range of IP addresses for our networks.
Some ideas include:

10.255.x.x
172.31.x.x
192.168.255.x

These are all still part of the private address space.

By using the more "unusual" addresses, we can minimise the risk of IP
conflicts.  Personally, for me, a lot of the 192.168.x.x address space will
cause conflicts for me.
> 
> Also what would the domain be? x.melbournewireless.dyns.org?, or each
> cell to his own.

Well, we will probably need a split DNS...  internal and external having
having different data.  Also, I think we should register a domain.  Dyndns
will be too inflexible, and is designed to resolve publicly accessible IPs
which are dynamic - a different kettle of fish.

--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at melbwireless.dyndns.org with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive of the Entire mailinst list at:
http://melbwireless.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless