[MLB-WIRELESS] Node JYK - Operational

[Andrew van Slageren]

Hi Greg,

5ghz to JEE would definitely be an improvement, but it would also 
potentially open up KVC, KHI and KKE to you as alternative/additional 
uplink options.

All of those nodes are running Ubiquiti AP's so would require Ubiquiti 
clients (e.g. PowerBeams), however KKE also has a Mikrotik 802.11ac AP 
as an additional option.

Cheers,
Andrew.

On 21/11/2015 8:35 PM, Greg McLennan wrote:
> Hi. As the owner of JOH I can confirm a significant loss between JOH & 
> JEE on 2.4GHz. I have had a fiddle with this link and have good RSL, 
> but the noise floor locally has definitely increased recently and 
> this old 7+yr old link is due for replacement ( 5GHz me thinking!)
> Cheers
> Greg, VK3JIY
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Andrew van Slageren
> Date:21/11/2015 5:23 PM (GMT+10:00)
> To: melbwireless at lists.wireless.org.au
> Subject: Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] Node JYK - Operational
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> I can hit you from node KFI (Geelong also), but looks like there is a
> fair bit of packet loss between (I'm guessing) JEE and JOH on 2.4ghz:
> andrew at bawt:~$ mtr --report 10.10.65.194
> Start: Sat Nov 21 17:11:45 2015
> HOST: bawt                        Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best Wrst 
> StDev
>    1.|-- kfi-rb.melbournewireless.  0.0%    10    0.3   0.3 0.3 0.4   0.0
>    2.|-- khi-powerbox.melbournewir  0.0%    10    2.6   2.6 1.6 4.3   0.7
>    3.|-- jee-rb-1.melbournewireles  0.0%    10    4.5   4.9 3.0 9.3   2.2
>    4.|-- jee-rb-2.melbournewireles  0.0%    10    4.9   5.2 3.8 7.9   1.3
>    5.|-- 10.5.5.5                  10.0%    10   22.2  21.1 12.5 
> 35.8   7.5
>    6.|-- 10.10.65.3.JEE.mw.org.au  20.0%    10   10.8  19.1 10.8 42.4  
> 10.0
>    7.|-- 10.10.66.94.KMT.mw.org.au 20.0%    10   31.9  31.2 23.0 57.4  
> 11.5
>    8.|-- 10.10.65.194.JYK.mw.org.a 30.0%    10   17.0  39.9 17.0 130.4
> 40.4
>
> While the 2.4gig waveguide at JEE blasts out a fair way, performance is
> very limited due to the amount of noise it picks up, as well as hidden
> node issues with lack of TDMA (such as Airmax or nstreme/NV2).
>
> Also if you're seeing over 200 OSPF routes in your routing table, that
> means the Geelong<>Melbourne connectivity should be working :)
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew.
>
> On 20/11/2015 4:27 PM, Richard Edwards wrote:
> > Hi Folks
> >
> > My node has been up and down over the last few years. Finally got some
> > time to put it together in a more robust and perm fashion.
> >
> > I would be interested if people can see me all the way down here in
> > Geelong.
> >
> > http://10.10.65.194/
> >
> > Looks like I have a decent OSPF route table on my main router now so
> > fingers crossed.
> > My subnet its Network 10.10.65.192/28 let me know if you can't see it in
> > your route table.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Richard
> > _______________________________________________
> > Melbwireless mailing list
> > Melbwireless at lists.wireless.org.au
> > https://lists.wireless.org.au/mailman/listinfo/melbwireless
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Melbwireless mailing list
> Melbwireless at lists.wireless.org.au
> https://lists.wireless.org.au/mailman/listinfo/melbwireless

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wireless.org.au/pipermail/melbwireless/attachments/20151121/42e07ee3/attachment.html>