[MLB-WIRELESS] Strange routingissues on 10.10.129.64/28 (GHO-North-5.8/HVC??)

[Robert Haines]

Hi Peter,

Yes, that seems to have done the trick. However, It looks like wireless 
client Isolation is enabled on GHO-North-58, and this may be the reason 
why we were having this problem (As HVC was a client on GHO-North-58, 
and couldn't route to other client nodes on this AP due to isolation)

Rob.

On 12/03/2012 3:35 AM, Peter Buncle wrote:
>
> HI Guy's
>
> I've change the way the routing works on this interface.
>
> Is it better now ?
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Peter
>
> *From:*melbwireless-bounces at lists.wireless.org.au 
> [mailto:melbwireless-bounces at lists.wireless.org.au] *On Behalf Of 
> *Robert Haines
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 6 March 2012 8:52 AM
> *To:* David Nuttall; melbwireless at lists.wireless.org.au
> *Subject:* Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] Strange routingissues on 10.10.129.64/28 
> (GHO-North-5.8/HVC??)
>
> Hi David,
>
> Great!! I'm not going mad!
>
> Looks like I need to talk to Peter (JIA) ... think we need to 
> tempoarily shut down this interface on HVC until they plug the cord 
> back in on JIA!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rob
>
> On 6/03/2012 12:34 AM, David Nuttall wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> Things are going OK till you get to JLP at Heidelberg.  (10.10.81.33 
> is the incoming interface from Box Hill)
>
> After that is where it goes bad.
>
> If it goes direct to GHO (10.10.80.5) all is good.
> If it goes via HVC (10.10.2.225) it gets lost.
>
> 1)  Looking at OSPF at JLP right now, it wants to send traffic to 
> 10.10.129.64/28 via HVC with a cost of 20!  There is a cost of 10 from 
> JLP to HVC.  That suggests 10.10.129.64/28 is directly connected to 
> HVC with a cost of 10 on it's interface.
>
> 2)  I pinged all of the addresses in 10.10.129.64/28 from JLP and a 
> response came back from 10.10.129.70 on the HVC interface.  Time was 1 mS.
>
> 3)  So it looks like you are right, 10.10.129.64/28 is on both HVC and 
> GHO.
>
> 4)  A couple of guesses....  Maybe an attempt to directly link HVC 
> with GHO after JIA died?  Maybe JIA was bridging HVC and GHO?  Someone 
> will know!
>
> Dave.
>
> Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and 
> content filtering.
> http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wireless.org.au/pipermail/melbwireless/attachments/20120312/69a9ddf7/attachment.html>