[MLB-WIRELESS] Bridge 802.11x (TKIP or AES)
Tony Langdon, VK3JED
vk3jed at optushome.com.au
Fri May 27 08:47:37 EST 2005
At 07:58 AM 5/27/2005, you wrote:
>why all the need for security? even when wep can be broken it stops 99%
>of people
I guess it depends on the application. Certainly, for a home network I'd
agree for 99% of cases. I run WEP, and I'm one of only 3 WLANs that run
WEP (out of about 15) in my area, so based on that, I figure WEP provides
all the protection I need.
Now if I was guarding a lot of highly sensitive data, against determined
hackers that would be a totally different matter, but for the average
punter, WEP at least tells the casual passing wardriver/user to "move
along"... :)
And the only reasons I don't want any freeloaders are:
1. ISP's AUP doesn't permit that kind of sharing (bugger!)
2. I make heavy demands on my upstream bandwidth. (one day I'll get the
time to figure out shaping :) ).
3. I don't want to assist anyone involved in piracy
(music/movies/pr0n)... Too much hassle these days, having ISPs kill one's
access and the Feds drop by kinda ruins ya day... ;)
WEP may not be particularly strong protection, but for the average home
user, it's a good start, and sufficient to stop the majority of problems.
For my own data, a lot of my internal communications takes place over SSH
(e.g. for mail). That's actually because I use SSH tunneling for access
from anywhere I can get an Internet connection, but communications over the
WLAN gets the benefit of SSH encryption as well.
73 de VK3JED
http://vkradio.com
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
More information about the Melbwireless
mailing list