[MLB-WIRELESS] Generic SSID?
Tim Hogard
thogard at knotty.abnormal.com
Mon Jun 27 12:40:20 EST 2005
Re: seamless romaing...
It comes down to two issues:
1) is the netwrok large enough to support romaing?
2) is it useful to have a unique id for a node when hunting for them
from var away.
At this time the answer to the 1st question is no
giving nodes a node name that can be found in the node database
means its helpful when doing long links so at this poing I don't
see any advantage for having everyone use the same ssid.
-tim
http://web.abnormal.com
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 10:45:41AM +1000, Dan Flett wrote:
> > >
> > >To have "seamless" roaming do all the AP's in the desired network have to
> > >have the same SSID, and the client lock onto (associate) to the strongest?
> >
> > I believe most APs support this feature - even Minitars support it. I
> > forget the actual technical name of the box that appears in the web
> > interface that needs to be ticked, but it is roaming. I'm not sure if it's
> > possible to offer roaming across APs from different manufacturers - it may
> > be if they support the aforementioned standard (not really a standard
> > though.)
>
> http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.11F-2003.pdf
>
> To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
> with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
>
>
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
More information about the Melbwireless
mailing list