[MLB-WIRELESS] DNS......READ THIS!
John McClumpha
john at incitegraphics.com.au
Thu Feb 24 21:43:06 EST 2005
You can request an IP block for your node already Brenton - as for
adding a dns entry - if a standard naming convention is put into place
then this could happen automatically
Brenton D wrote:
> the mwnode part should be addedd into the users edit
> node page on the mw site so that they can add an ip
> address to there node id.
> --- owner-melbwireless at wireless.org.au
> <sneeze at alphalink.com.au> wrote:
>
>>Nice idea in theory....but I can't see it happening.
>>
>>The problem is other wireless groups won't take
>
> kindly to one group making
>
>>a decision like that. The other issue is that other
>
> wireless groups
>
>>already have other DNS systems, some similar to this
>
> one. Another issue is
>
>>that we really shouldn't be thinking about linking
>
> interstate when we
>
>>aren't linked up within the state.
>>
>>There's a lot of getting ahead of ourselves which
>
> results in nobody making
>
>>a decision in the end and nothing progressing at
>
> all. Part of the reason I
>
>>have become so jaded.
>>
>>With the mwnode.com DNS setup, it took nothing to
>
> setup, it works for
>
>>everyone, it's very simple. Until such time as
>
> someone can show the group
>
>>another system that works and an actual *need* for
>
> another system, why
>
>>bother?
>>
>>I had a draft of another DNS system ready to go
>
> sometime ago that would
>
>>have also worked but was more involved. I came to
>
> the conclusion that I
>
>>could put the idea out there and people would say
>
> great stuff, but nothing
>
>>was ever going to happen. So mwnode.com happened
>
> overnight and it does the
>
>>job fine.
>>
>>So my opinion would be to just keep using it until
>
> there is good reason to
>
>>change. Concentrate on other things such as getting
>
> active services on the
>
>>network, working on better routing design, and more
>
> links between groups.
>
>>It's all very well to have a free wireless network
>
> but if nobody does
>
>>anything with it what's the point? (pings don't
>
> count)
>
>>
>>
>>>Hi Ryan,
>>>
>>>thanks for the info - I was unaware of such a
>
> system already in place.
>
>>>My only thought is that the naming convention is
>
> very specific to
>
>>>*melbourne*wireless - at present this doesn't
>
> matter - however if (when)
>
>>>melb wireless manages to spread its wings and
>
> connect with one of the
>
>>>interstate networks things may be a little
>
> different. I would have
>
>>>though a more generic, national naming convention
>
> would be the best
>
>>option?
>>
>>>keep in mind I am simply sharing my thoughgts on
>
> this - I am unaware of
>
>>>the history of this to date (as, it would seem, are
>
> many others).
>
>>>Has this naming convention been set in stone by the
>
> committee or is it
>
>>>just one that has got "off the ground"?
>>>
>>>john
>>>node INQ
>>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe: send mail to
>
> majordomo at wireless.org.au
>
>>with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the
>
> message
>
>
>
> =====
> Brenton (iViLe)
> Access node fut from the web, live stats. http://211.28.235.187:6111
> ivile01 at yahoo.com.au ivile at bur.st
> www.ivile.tk
> www.waveguides.tk
> MW NODE: FUT, FUU
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
> .
>
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
More information about the Melbwireless
mailing list