[MLB-WIRELESS] Galaxy antenna - specs?

[Fenn Bailey]

Hey there,

If you compare the sizes of the hills commercial 24dB and 15dB antennas, you
should get a vague feel for how big each is (though from memory, the
galaxies are _slightly_ smaller?)

https://www.wireless.hillsantenna.com.au/Hills.Wireless.Website/product?code
=a1100dir

	Fenn.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-melbwireless at wireless.org.au 
> [mailto:owner-melbwireless at wireless.org.au] On Behalf Of John 
> McClumpha
> Sent: Thursday, 10 February 2005 2:44 PM
> To: vk3jma at ozemail.com.au; melbwireless at wireless.org.au
> Subject: Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] Galaxy antenna - specs?
> 
> Hhmm... Ok - any way of knowing whether mine is the larger or 
> smaller? I'll measure it when I get home to see how big it is 
> (although it did amaze me just how much bigger it seemed once 
> we got it down from the roof!)
> 
> 
> On 10/2/05 2:08 PM, "vk3jma at ozemail.com.au" 
> <vk3jma at ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> 
> > The 2 types of antenna have a spec for 18dbi & 25dbi.  the 
> larger size 
> > haveng the larger gain of course.
> > 
> > Pacific has a 14dbi and 19dbi I think?
> > 
> > There should be no reason to suspect that the gain changes after 
> > modification as you are still using the same parts (minus 
> > electronics).  There will however be losses due to 
> mis-match in dipole 
> > spec vs freq but at the end of it all, what ever is received or 
> > transmitted by the dipole element will still be subject to 
> the gain spec of the whole system.
> 
> 
> John
> --
> MW Node: INQ
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au with 
> "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
> 


To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message