[MLB-WIRELESS] Re: melbwireless-dev' development list?

[Rob]

Hello List,

That's a good reply from Dan, it would be great to keep the Melbourne
Wireless list as Dan has written in his reply    8-)

Although I do not have much to offer I have learnt many things just by
following threads....  We are a group of people from varying backgrounds
trying to achieve a similar goal in a hobby ( none of us are on a payrole
are we ? ) that gives us a bit of fun and personal satisfaction......

To me this is what's it's all about,

Cheers,

Rob.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Flett" <conhoolio at hotmail.com>
To: "'Dan McGarry'" <it.psl at fsp.org.vu>; "'Matt Mills'"
<amadeus at netspace.net.au>
Cc: <melbwireless at wireless.org.au>
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 2:31 PM
Subject: RE: [MLB-WIRELESS] Re: melbwireless-dev' development list?


> Dan McGarry wrote:
>
> > Matt Mills wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm  generally a passive listener to this stuff, but would take a
> great
> > > interest in the devel conversations..... as would most people on
> this
> > > list I imagine.
> >
> > Seconded. I'm actually in Vanuatu, but this is one of several mailing
> > lists I'm lurking on to try and keep track of best practices,
> > up-and-coming tech and good deals. A dev mailing list would mean I
> > wouldn't have to spam the group with what would likely be irrelevant
> > questions in a general discussion, but on-topic for a strictly
> technical
> > thread.
>
> > Michael Borthwick wrote:
> >
> > > On 06/02/2005, at 7:41 PM, Matt Mills wrote:
> > >> So 2 weeks after people are talking about the death of melbourne
> > >> wireless from lack of traffic, people are talking about dividing up
> > >> the mailing list???
> > >>
> > > Yeah, my thoughts exactly :-)
>
> My own personal feelings are that the list doesn't need to be split in
> two, purely for volume reasons.  Personally I'm quite happy to discuss
> complex technical issues in the main list.  So why did I raise this
> issue in the first place?  I feel that there are those out there who are
> reluctant to contribute their technical thoughts to the main list, but
> who would be happier to contribute to a smaller audience in a
> specialised list.  Things like routing need to be discussed and debated
> and I feel some are not as willing as I to air their strong opinions in
> a general list like this.  I want to encourage more people to speak up -
> Matt Mills you're one such person. :)
>
> In general I'd like to see people with strong opinions on any wireless
> issues speaking up in here.  It's what makes the list interesting -
> don't be afraid it'll turn into a flame war - we're all mature adults in
> here aren't we? :) Debates don't need to turn personal, and at the end
> of the day we're all striving for much the same thing.  I don't even see
> a problem if political "camps" form around some issues - although we may
> not be big enough for such a situation to occur.  Nevertheless, lively,
> intelligent debate is informative and entertaining and I'd like to see
> more of it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dan
>
> To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
> with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.5 - Release Date: 3/02/2005
>
>



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.5 - Release Date: 3/02/2005


To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message