[MLB-WIRELESS] cable

Jamie Moir jmoir at jmcs.net.au
Tue Mar 16 18:54:44 EST 2004



On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 darrend at ndpgroup.com.au wrote:

> RG-174 = dummy load @ 2.4GHz :P
> RG-316 = good :)

The correct answer: irrelevant

Fussing over 6th of 4/5 of f*ck all loss isnt where you should be spending
your time. If you accept that you need a decent link margin, say 15dB,
then you arent going to get it quibbling over 0.2 - 0.1 dB/m loss *over
300mm*.

</rant>

Jamie


To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message



More information about the Melbwireless mailing list