[MLB-WIRELESS] cable
Jamie Moir
jmoir at jmcs.net.au
Tue Mar 16 18:54:44 EST 2004
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 darrend at ndpgroup.com.au wrote:
> RG-174 = dummy load @ 2.4GHz :P
> RG-316 = good :)
The correct answer: irrelevant
Fussing over 6th of 4/5 of f*ck all loss isnt where you should be spending
your time. If you accept that you need a decent link margin, say 15dB,
then you arent going to get it quibbling over 0.2 - 0.1 dB/m loss *over
300mm*.
</rant>
Jamie
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
More information about the Melbwireless
mailing list