[MLB-WIRELESS] Hypothetical: takedown notices

[Ryan Abbenhuys]

I don't like hearing that "mesh" word.  I thought we were moving more
towards the backbone (with redundant links) and leaf node area.

I've heard that a true wireless mesh won't work because the noise floor
increases too rapidly and the network speed dies in the ass.


>At 10:43 AM 6/03/03, grenville armitage wrote:
> >That would seem to be an important
> >issue to clarify.
>
>Some how I have the feeling that many of these issues may well have been 
>resolved/clarified by the time we actually get our mesh systems up & 
>running. How many do we have now that are actually meshed? How many do we 
>have that are "real close" to meshing?  How many allow the public to
access 
>the 'net?
>
>Hopefully I'm wrong but it seems like we have a way to go before these 
>types of things become an issue. Not saying it shouldn't be discussed,
just 
>saying I won't loose too many sleep cycles stressing over it :)
>
>Cheers,
>
>Grant
>
>
>------------------------------
>Grant McHerron
>Tao Ceti Pty Ltd
>
>Level 1, 530 Little Collins St, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia
>Ph: +61 3 9909 7067             Fax: +61 3 9228 3257
>http://www.taoceti.com.au       grant at taoceti.com.au
>
>
>To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
>with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
>
>




To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message