[MLB-WIRELESS] What about?? Was.. RE: Free access to Uni networks?

[evilbunny]

Hello Radio,

I'm not doubting major installations require more then WEP, but for
home user setups etc... I doubt most people threw in $100k worth of
gear...

mind you $100k of cisco product doesn't get you much, cisco 802.1x
security measures are A LOT more secure then plain old WEP...

-- 
Best regards,
 evilbunny                            mailto:evilbunny at sydneywireless.com

http://www.SydneyWireless.com - Exercise your communications
freedom to make it do what you never thought possible... 

Friday, September 6, 2002, 1:56:57 PM, you wrote:

RT> At 12:05 PM 9/6/02 +1000, evilbunny wrote:
>>Hello KevinL,
>>
>>WEP is a 2 dollar lock, for all it's faults, how many people here
>>would seriously think that they have anything so special someone will
>>spend weeks trying to crack it?
>>
>>Yes it's flawed, but it takes considerable amounts of time to break
>>it...

RT> I have a customer in Melbourne, who has installed $100,000 worth of
RT> Access Points and associated infrastructure and they will NOT turn it
RT> on, UNTIL the company IT wizards can guarantee security, the system has been
RT> installed for 9 months with Cisco AP's.
RT> I am hooking an Industrial Process Monitoring system to it all.
RT> Yes, these guys have been reading recent media articles on Wireless
RT> Hacking......the article in the Herald Sun was presented at our Project
RT> Engineers meeting......security is the word :-)

RT> Jack 
RT> Rockhampton.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1966 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.wireless.org.au/pipermail/melbwireless/attachments/20020906/7800aa63/attachment.p7s>