[MLB-WIRELESS] [TECH] Dipole antennas, and melbwireless structure

[Jon]

Ben Anderson wrote:

> > If the discovery mechanism can cope with new nodes appearing anyway, and
> works well, then hopefully
> > this would just be a matter of parameters - ie. shorter timeouts, more
> re-tries, etc - for a mobile
> > protocol.
>
> Yep, but there's scaling issues if we have to to a route-update across the
> network, for the whole network every second to keep track of nodes....
>
> Ben.

A node that is moving fast, or otherwise behaving "badly", should not be
involved in routing.
Nodes should have to "earn trust" to be involved in routing.


Jon



--
I've played piano in a whorehouse.  I've smuggled secret papers out of
Russia...I've taught a gangster mob how to play Pinchie Winchie, sat on the
floor with Greta Garbo, horsed around with the Prince of Wales, played
ping-pong with George Gershwin.  George Bernard Shaw has asked me for advice.
I've basked on the Riviera with Somerset Maugham and Elsa Maxwell.  I've been
thrown out of the casino at Monte Carlo.

       - Harpo Marx



--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless