[MLB-WIRELESS] [TECH] Dipole antennas, and melbwireless structure

Bryce Letcher bryce at lectronix.com.au
Wed Mar 20 23:30:55 EST 2002



-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Hawtin [mailto:kim at aldigital.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2002 22:40
To: Ben Anderson
Cc: jon at webprophets.net.au; Tony Langdon; melbwireless at wireless.org.au;
Tony Langdon, VK3JED
Subject: Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] [TECH] Dipole antennas, and melbwireless
structure


<snip>

now if you push up the output power and range of the fixed nodes
that offer connection, such that the time your in the 'zone' is
larger, then the time your 'online' with a particular fixed node,
then your much more likely to get a sesible connection ...

this is the main reason that mobile phones as we know them, work.
its a trade off between, a large enough area, not too much power so
that the base station can still 'hear' the mobile phones ....

yours,

kim

Actually mobile phones use different TX to RX frequencies so there is no
problem with interference. The other reason mobiles can move seemlessly
between cells is that the whole process is controlled by a central computer
system. If fact there is no comparison at all between the systems, as the
mobile is circuit switched and not packet driven, and as  said, centrally
controlled.

rgds,
Bryce


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless



More information about the Melbwireless mailing list