[MLB-WIRELESS] limiting access..

[Random]

The problem you have is that XP's NAT is limited in fuctionality, I
don't know if it can be registry hacked (maybe?) but basically there is
no option to NAT for two subnet's, so you can't do what you want. The
actual RRAS service that runs the nat does provide support for this but
MS have obviously taken part of that out. :(

What you may need to consider is a 3rd party addon, something like NAT32
(www.nat32.com) which adds a whole lot of functionality and
configurability to windows nat..

---
Martin Laukkanen (martinl at infocom.com.au)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Healy [mailto:jimmy at deefa.com] 
> Sent: Monday, 24 June 2002 11:38 AM
> To: melbwireless at wireless.org.au
> Subject: RE: [MLB-WIRELESS] limiting access..
> 
> 
> > So doing this allows you to route between wireless and LAN without
> using a
> > utility like WinRoute?  That's cool!
> > 
> > One thing though...  How do you specify which interfaces to route
> between?
> 
> I'm not IP guru, but just tried the following setup in XP :
> 
> XP box with three interfaces. NIC for optus (DHCP), NIC for 
> Local Lan (192.168.0.1), and a wireless NIC (10.0.1.1).
> 
> Internet sharing is turned on, but XP makes you select an 
> interface to share it on, so it's shared on the Local LAN.
> 
> With the registry hack, from my lappy using a wireless card 
> (10.0.1.2), I can ping both the wireless network, and the 
> local LAN (192.168.0.1-3).
> 
> However, since both the subnets I'm using for my local 
> networks are not globally routable, and internet sharing 
> performs NAT only on the Local network, and not on the 
> wireless subnet = no net on my wireless network
> :-)
> 
> any ideas ??
> 
> James
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
> with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
> 
> 

To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message