[MLB-WIRELESS] Fw: Wireless community networks vs. corporate ones, by Annalee Newitz
Clae
clae at tpg.com.au
Tue Jun 18 15:14:27 EST 2002
>Hmmzor. The words "spell doom for monopoly" bode well. The word "doom" does
>not.
>- Barry
"...Perhaps the greatest weapon the wireless groups have, which AT&T
doesn't, is their commitment to community. "I'm not hoping to
get any money out of my project," Pozar says. "We're a nonprofit.
I just want to do good work. This grows out of my work
with community
radio stations. Back then, I founded those stations to
create a better
world through democratic communication. And that's what I'm trying
to do now."..."
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Declan McCullagh" <declan at well.com>
>To: <politech at politechbot.com>
>Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 3:25 PM
>Subject: FC: Wireless community networks vs. corporate ones, by Annalee
>Newitz
>
> > http://www.sfbg.com/36/37/cover_wireless.html
--
David Clae Gason
Secretary, Melbourne Wireless
mailto:secretary at wireless.org.au
http://wireless.org.au
i hate anarchists. i think there should be a law against them -tahl
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
More information about the Melbwireless
mailing list