[MLB-WIRELESS] Paths clearing for wireless networks

dean dean.collins at bigpond.com
Tue Jun 18 09:37:21 EST 2002


Congratulations to everyone involved in getting this happening, it is a major step in the ongoing security and continuation of our
networks.

Cheers,
Dean

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	owner-melbwireless at wireless.org.au [mailto:owner-melbwireless at wireless.org.au]  On Behalf Of Drew
Sent:	Tuesday, 18 June 2002 6:57 AM
To:	melbwireless at wireless.org.au
Subject:	[MLB-WIRELESS] Paths clearing for wireless networks

Paths clearing for wireless networks
By Sue Cant
June 18 2002


Within weeks, the regulatory clouds shadowing community wireless groups
should clear. The Australian Communications Authority is working on a
series of tests to allow such groups to operate legally without giving a
free kick to commercial operators.

Earlier this year the Minister for Communications, IT and the Arts,
Senator Richard Alston, requested his department work with the ACA to
resolve the legal standing of community wireless groups effectively
providing a public network.

Under the law, such a network requires a $10,000 carrier's licence
unless it is not being used for commercial purposes.

Establishing whether such a network is being used for profit is
difficult in the wild west of the wireless world.

But forcing potentially innovative users to pay when the philosophy is
supposed to be about encouraging new entrants and open access is not the
IT-savvy image government wants to project.

"We recognise hobbyists have some trepidation that we may come down hard
on them," the ACA's head of telecom licensing, Paul White, says.

"We don't wish to prejudice the hobbyist but we don't wish to give
commercial operators a free leg-up."

One of these groups, Melbourne Wireless, which represents thousands of
wireless users in Australia and New Zealand, has been lobbying the
Federal Government and the ACA for its position to be clarified.

"By preventing organisations such as Melbourne Wireless from
establishing their own networks, the long-term interests of end users
are being thwarted," the group says in a submission to a parliamentary
inquiry into wireless broadband.

Melbourne Wireless president Steven Haigh says present broadband
services are not equitable, accessible or affordable, and Melbourne
Wireless's network will be free or low-cost.

In the ACA's submission to the inquiry, the regulator says that last
December it was approached by Brismesh, a Brisbane group wanting to set
up a wireless local area network. Brismesh was seeking advice on the
issue of a carrier's licence.

"A requirement for a carrier licence in this instance would make such a
proposal unworkable and deny the intended community any benefits that a
low-cost broadband service could provide," the ACAsubmisson says.

To meet the concerns of users, the ACA is developing rules to bind
wireless groups to a not-for-profit charter.

White says the groups will need to be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

While the regulator is still working on the tests, White says it is
likely the ACA will seek information about the arrangements between the
network providers and users and how funds are being used by the operators.

Meanwhile, in another submission to the parliamentary inquiry,
telecommunications analyst Paul Budde says wireless will never be able
to match the reliability, quality and robustness that fixed line offers.

Budde says investment is lacking to make wireless networks function
beyond niche markets.

"Without massive government support, the development of wireless systems
in most rural and regional areas in Australia will never happen," Budde
says.

He says the government missed an opportunity to support such systems by
"playing it safe" and selecting Telstra for two large-scale regional
projects.

"The other contenders had developed unique wireless solutions that were
seen by the government as too risky."

But Budde says the reality is that wireless is a niche market.

This story was found at:
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/06/15/1023864366638.html


Steven Haigh wrote:

>Check out the article on the front page of the IT section of tomorrows The Age
>- not sure what other papers will carry it in other states...
>
>
>





To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message



To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message



More information about the Melbwireless mailing list