[MLB-WIRELESS] Re: Regional Groups? (aka: WG Outer East mailing list)

[KevinL]

Fine by me.  Probably more appropriate to split the regional groups away
from the working groups, I agree.

KevinL

On Fri, 2002-06-14 at 12:38, Tyson.Clugg at csiro.au wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> When I started the Working Groups, my intention was that they would be used
> to work through problems that can be solved, such as routing (solution:
> OSPF), structure (solution: adopt model rules), federal inquiries (solution:
> make submission), etc.  Hence my first suggestion for a heading (in
> WGTemplate) is to have a defined goal for the group.
> 
> The idea never really crossed my mind that the WG's could be used to
> geographically divide MW into smaller groups, and hence they don't really
> fit in with the intent of a working group (to provide a solution to a
> problem).  To this end, I suggest that these should be classed separately,
> as "Regional Groups" (or RG's for short), so as to avoid confusion regarding
> their intent.
> 
> If anyone can suggest any good reasons as to why the "Regional Groups"
> should NOT be separated from the Working Groups, then please speak up.
> Otherwise, I shall separate the regional groups form the working groups,
> starting by creating a new wiki page called "RegionalGroups".  The next
> thing to do would of course be to move items such as WGInnerNorth to
> RGInnerNorth.
> 
> Regards,
> Tyson.
> ___________________________
> 
>    Tyson.Clugg at csiro.au
>  Treasurer at wireless.org.au
>    B/H: +61 3 9545 8117
>    A/H: +61 3 9887 0117
>    Mob: +61 4 0889 7662
> ___________________________


To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message