[MLB-WIRELESS] New submissions to the wireless broadband inquiry

[Clae]

So who's up for appearing before the inquiry when they have hearings?


At 10:16 PM +1000 6/6/02, Barry Park wrote:
>My gripe is that this is a poisoned submission. It's just a shame that they
>will probably not be called to back up what is fundamentally a flawed
>submission with hard evidence of wrongdoing by either corporate or community
>groups. Hell, the way it is worded, IDS must believe there is already a
>working community network already out there openly flouting ACA guidelines.
>I just hope the inquiry panel see through it.
>- Barry
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jamie Lovick <jalovick at doof.org>
>To: melbwireless at wireless.org.au <melbwireless at wireless.org.au>
>Date: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:03 PM
>Subject: Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] New submissions to the wireless broadband
>inquiry
>
>  >Personally, I think the best way to tackle this is to prove them wrong.
>

-- 
David Clae Gason
Secretary, Melbourne Wireless
mailto:secretary at wireless.org.au
http://wireless.org.au

i hate anarchists. i think there should be a law against them  -tahl

To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message