[MLB-WIRELESS] IPv?

[Tony Langdon]

> Incidentally, let's not get into a debate about fowarding 
> other protocols,
> please - if you *really* want to play Doom or Warcraft using 
> IPX, use kali

Hehehe, exactly. :-)

> On this point, I'm inclined to agree with you. At least for 
> the first few
> months/years we should allow IPv4 traffic across the network.
> 
> That having been said, there is no reason we cannot use IPv6 
> when and where
> it's appropriate. IPv6 routers all (except for some of the 
> core routers in
> the 6bone) talk IPv4 as well.

<snip>

I have to agree.  One of the purposes of this network should be to
experiment (well, as far as I'm concerned, I'd like to see it that way).
Hmm, "ham networking"? ;-)  IPV6 is the better long term prospect.  The days
of IPv4 are numbered, though it will exist in pockets for a very long time
on an IPv6 infrastructure in the future.

Hey, let's get involved and have a play with IPv6, and maintain support for
IPv4 as well.  Sounds like fun to me (and a bloody good reason I should get
into the WLAN ;) ).

So which protocol?  Both, of course :)

---
Outgoing mail has been scanned for viruses
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.314 / Virus Database: 175 - Release Date: 11-Jan-02
 

This correspondence is for the named person’s use only. It may contain
confidential or legally privileged information or both. No confidentiality
or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this
correspondence in error, please immediately delete it from your system and
notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or rely on any part of this
correspondence if you are not the intended recipient.

Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at melbwireless.dyndns.org with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://melbwireless.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless