[MLB-WIRELESS] IPv?

[Drew]

Every OS supports IPV4 out of the box
Clients will be expecting IPV4, not IPV6
Best way for this network to succeed is to make the barrier to entry 
*extremely low*
IPV6 isn't ready for prime time, try obtaining a *real* block of ipv6 
ip's and see where you get
10.x.x.x will be plenty
Please let this thread die

-D

Mark Saward wrote:

>I don't see the point of sticking to IPV4, unless someone can direct me
>to some relevant material.
>
>This WAN is not connected to the net, it is new.  Why continue to give
>old standards a stronger foothold?  This is a perfect opportunity to
>implement the new IPV6, so why continue with the old?
>
>>I don't recall this being discussed...
>>
>>Should Melbwireless go IPV4 or or be brave and try IPV6?
>>



--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at melbwireless.dyndns.org with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://melbwireless.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless