[MLB-WIRELESS] ip allocation list based on suburb
darrend at natwide.com.au
darrend at natwide.com.au
Wed Feb 13 15:13:41 EST 2002
Darren Dreis
IT Manager
Nationwide Digital Products P/L
Tel 03 9548 9444 Fax 03 9548 9040
Drew Whittle
<drew at blackalba To: melbwireless at wireless.org.au
tross.com> cc:
Subject: Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] ip allocation list
14/02/2002 based on suburb
01:36 AM
Please respond
to melbwireless
On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 16:10, darrend at natwide.com.au wrote:
>
>> I'm sure this has been mentioned before....
>> We all agree that we'll eventually need to use an ip routing protocol
(ie
>> not static routes) to allow for redundancy and multihoming. That being
the
>> case, it does NOT matter what ip's are allocated where. Forget about
this
>You still want to minimise the complexity of your routing.
Complex routing will be unavoidable, I think we all know that. It's not
like we're going to be using baby routers with 2MB flash. Even a crappy 486
running xnix could support tens of thousands of dynamic routing entries.
>> suburb, postcode or whatever else crap for IP's. Remember why DNS was
>> invented???
>Because it is easier for people to remember words than a string of
>numbers. DNS has _nothing_ to do with routing.
That was meant to be a retorical question.
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless
More information about the Melbwireless
mailing list