[MLB-WIRELESS] ip allocation list based on suburb

[darrend at natwide.com.au]

>Actually, having a vaguely regional IP address allocation policy makes
>some kind of sense from the point of view of routing aggregation.

possibly, but down to the suburb level would be ludicrous. Some suburbs may
have 1 node, other may have 100.

> In the end, I think we'll have no choice but to use the 10.x.x.x private
> space for host addressing, possibly 172.16.x.x for routing devices etc.

> Not "in the end".  Just "for the moment".  ;)

agreed... sorry... I was thinking in the 'pre global' tense.



--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless