[MLB-WIRELESS] IP address range for Geelong?

[Luke Schapel]

It does not matter what ip address is allocated, just make sure
no one has the same! 10.x.x.x 192.168.x.x Who cares?

If you give nodes a full class C range, it is surely enough
to meet all needs. Subnet if that node requires it. Don't be
concerned that this address might be used by Joe Bloggs in his
private network (LAN). Allocate address ranges (/24) as the nodes
become operational (10.1.1.x 10.1.2.x etc), from your node database.

It doesn't matter if Geelong and Melbourne create a link, as the
network addresses will be unique, routing is easy.

Luke

Andy Freeman wrote:
> 
> Hi Melbourne Wireless!  :-)
> 
> We have a few nodes starting to pop-up in Geelong at the moment and I
> think its time that we looked at IP addresses to delegate.
> 
> I read that you guys were looking at the 10.x.x.x range and think that
> we should probably grab a chunk of that so as to avoid conflicts (should
> we ever join the dots to Melbourne)
> 
> How about delegating everything above [10.200.0.0] for Geelong?
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
>                Andy.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'
> Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
> IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless

--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless