[MLB-WIRELESS] Wireless 'cloud' may offer silver lining Or isit just 'pie-in-the-sky' technology?
Radio Tech
radio at dodo.com.au
Sat Aug 3 17:54:14 EST 2002
Darren, There is a certain degree of responsibility by all radio users of
the spectrum.....ISM bands or others, to share resources. Tyson says that
its tough luck for commercial services using ISM bands, IF they get wiped out.
So....what are you going to think if poorly engineered 802.11 gear takes out a
hospital Cardiac Unit Monitor System? People are modifying antennas for
more gain to get good range etc......OK that's fun and experimentation etc,
BUT could cause potential interference problems.
Its no good having a "stuff everyone else" attitude to other users of ISM
bands.
Right now, 802.11 users are looking for more operational privledges......
that will require sanction from the ACA, and possibly others.
Yes, have a look at Section 197 of the Radcomm Act 1992, public ISM bands
or not, it CAN be applied. Yes, I will be in Melbourne in October.
Jack
Rockhampton
At 09:54 AM 8/3/02 +1000, Darren wrote:
>
>Jack, I can't quite understand why you responded in such a way to Tyson's
>comments. The fact is that (aside from tonys atv stuff), his comments were
>essentially inline with those made by the ACA anyway. Might I suggest you
>read the transcripts of the aca's hearing at the recent parliamentary
>inquiry, in particular where they talk about commercial networks opperating
>in the 'public park' ism bands.
>That being said, if you're going to be in melbourne, please get in touch
>with us. There's plenty of us radio geeks around here! :)
>See ya,
>
>Darren Dreis
>Vice President
>Melbourne Wireless Inc.
>vicepresident at wireless.org.au
>http://www.wireless.org.au
>
>
>
>
> Radio Tech
> <radio at dodo.com.au> To:
melbwireless at wireless.org.au
> Sent by: cc:
> owner-melbwireless at wirel Subject: Re:
[MLB-WIRELESS] Wireless 'cloud' may offer silver
> ess.org.au lining Or isit just
'pie-in-the-sky' technology?
>
>
> 03/08/2002 07:21 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>At 07:39 PM 8/2/02 +0000, vortex wrote:
>>On Friday 02 August 2002 12:04 pm, Radio Tech wrote:
>>
>>> I have decided to play 802.11 as a hobby with people who want to
>experiment
>>> and have fun doing it......I don't feel like an all out war against
>other
>>> ISM band users. As for 1kW on the ATV gear.....good luck to
>VK3JED.....IF
>>> he wipes out the ISM band....its only a matter of time before he gets a
>>> visit. Read the ACA regs about "knowingly causing interference" on ANY
>band
>>> :-) As one of the committee of Melb Wireless I thought you would have a
>>> more responsible attitude towards bettering the image of 802.11 and all
>the
>>> users. I was looking at setting up an AP at the Melb Convention Centre
>in
>>> October at the Austronics 2002 Exhibition......give me ONE good reason
>why
>>> I should now bother?
>>
>>because you shouldn't judge the activities of the hundreds of network
>>activists globally through one post to MW.
>>
>>shine,
>>
>>.vortex
>
>Maybe you are right, but since the post was made by a prominent committee
>member of an organisation representing the 802.11 community in general.
>Not to mention, the ACA is on this list too.........
>Yes, I don't mind a laugh or two either.....but one needs to be very
>careful
>in the choice of words in a public forum, particularly when there are
>sensitive
>subjects to consider....like my foobar about Internet Access :-)
>
>Jack
>Rockhampton
>
>To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
>with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
More information about the Melbwireless
mailing list