[MLB-WIRELESS] AWA

[David Saab]

Great idea Rick! I'll see it gets brought up in the meeting today.

Dave.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-melbwireless at wireless.org.au
[mailto:owner-melbwireless at wireless.org.au] On Behalf Of rick
Sent: Thursday, 11 April 2002 2:38 PM
To: melbwireless at www.wireless.org.au; Matthew.C.Boyd at uts.edu.au
Subject: Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] AWA


oh oh another idea, aplications for voteing membership and takes a month
before you can start voteing

after this vote this friday

that way if you want 2 stack votes you have to plan over a month a head?

just a idea


----- Original Message -----
From: <Matthew.C.Boyd at uts.edu.au>
To: <melbwireless at www.wireless.org.au>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] AWA


> My main concern about voting membership being open to anyone who just
wants
> to sign up is that its open to abuse. It would be relatively easy for 
> someone to stack a meeting or a vote. While the group has no assets 
> and relys on cooperation then things are fine. I'm sure people can 
> think of suitable horror stories or scenarios. I don't think that 
> people should need to be a member to access the network and 
> classifying the guy in the cafe who uses my AP to check his email as a

> member might be stretching the point. There might be a further layer 
> of services that people would need to join to obtain (eg possibly 
> internet to make it legal). I don't think there should be any 
> restrictions on joining either. I do think that a waiting period 
> should apply to new members when it comes to voting and applying
for
> things like executive positions. Obviously we need to take into 
> account that the group is very new so waiting periods should probably 
> just be long enough for us to see trouble approaching and duck at this

> stage.
>
> I think there needs to be a relatively narrow definition of membership
that
> would probably include most of the people on this list.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> At 11:19 AM 11/04/02 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> >When drafting the policy proposal, this was debated at great 
> >length...
> >
> >We ended up agreeing, that because it is a public network, and not a
members
> >only type thing, then we're never going to know exactly who or how 
> >many members we have... We are not going to restrict on people that 
> >connect to the network as a whole, and as such, we don't know who 
> >will access the network from day to day.
> >
> >Are the people that just use the network occasionally on a "because 
> >it's there" basis then members? how do we track them down?
> >
> >One idea that was raised is that we have an online "Voting Members" 
> >database. This would require you to enter your name, address, phone
number
> >etc, and also entitle you to one vote. Now this eventually could be 
> >used
for
> >online voting, proxy voting, meeting votes etc - but we are not at a
stage
> >at this specific point in time to make that happen... This is our 
> >main driving force behind getting at least a structure approved and 
> >running on Friday. The other details can be altered according to the 
> >policy...
> >
> >Signed,
> >Steven Haigh
>
>
> To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
> with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
>


To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message




To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message