[MLB-WIRELESS] IP Addressing

[Matt Pearce]

RE: [MLB-WIRELESS] IP AddressingWhy dont we just discuss this at our meeting on Friday???  That way everyone gets to vote on the idea they most like, cause all I am seeing here is a lot of talk on which nobody can decide an answer and quite frankly I dont care what the range is so long as I have a IP address or two I can use for my nodes and links.  And to be honest I dont really see what all the difference is either with all the different addresses with the exception of the 192.168. range.

Matt
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tony Langdon 
  To: 'ABBENHUYS, Ryan' ; 'Melbwireless (E-mail) 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:25 AM
  Subject: RE: [MLB-WIRELESS] IP Addressing


  It depends.  If you want to have connectivity with the rest of the network, you should have your IPs coordinated.  If it's a private, isolated link, no need to.

  Tony Langdon
  Systems Development and Support
  ATC Training Australasia.  Level 1 310 King St Melbourne 3000.
  Phone:  1300 13 1983   WWW:  http://www.atctraining.com.au
    -----Original Message-----
    From: ABBENHUYS, Ryan [mailto:rabbenhuys at mfbb.vic.gov.au]
    Sent: Tuesday, 9 April 2002 11:17
    To: 'Melbwireless (E-mail)
    Subject: RE: [MLB-WIRELESS] IP Addressing


    Someone who knows what they're doing can modify the IPAllocation Wiki page and make it clear what ranges people should be within depending on what they are doing.

    I assume the only people who will require ranges will be people running Access Points?  Won't anyone wanting to connect to an AP then just speak to them to receieve a static IP within their range or be allocated one via DHCP?

    I don't see a reason that every individual or even people just doing their own point to point links will need to pick a range and be listed on the page.



    -----Original Message----- 
    From: Justin [mailto:littlejuz at optusnet.com.au] 
    Sent: Tuesday, 9 April 2002 10:55 

    Gents, 

     These are the ranges we have been talking about for a month 
     or two now. No one has suggested anything better, so how do 
     we go about making it 'official' and start allocating IPs? 

    Regards, 
    Gaz. 



    ___________________________

    WARNING
    This email and any attachment may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient you are not authorised to copy or disclose all or any part of it without the prior written consent of the Metropolitan Fire and Emergency Services Board.
    ___________________________


    ---
    Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.336 / Virus Database: 188 - Release Date: 11-Mar-02




  ---
  Outgoing mail has been scanned for viruses
  Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
  Version: 6.0.336 / Virus Database: 188 - Release Date: 11-Mar-02




  This correspondence is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information or both. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this correspondence in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or rely on any part of this correspondence if you are not the intended recipient.



  Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wireless.org.au/pipermail/melbwireless/attachments/20020409/595e7c01/attachment.html>